An urgent assignment for the Senate: Judicial confirmations

The striking politicization of the process is leaving too many cases to linger for too long.
ajc.com

There’s an urgent task awaiting the U.S. Senate when it returns Monday from its August recess for a three-week work period before departing to campaign until the November elections: The Senate and the president must collaborate and seat numerous lower federal court jurists.

The primary reason why senators must close these vacancies is that the courts need every member to promptly, inexpensively and fairly resolve colossal dockets. These judgeships remain empty substantially because of the apparently persistent, downward spiraling confirmation wars propelled by striking politicization of the selection process.

Placeholder Image

icon to expand image

Democrats should nevertheless rigorously persevere and carefully and dutifully fill the remaining court vacancies, as the bench depends on having sufficient resources to perform its duties. Mindful of the necessary urgency, Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., has promptly scheduled a robust cloture vote, which limits debate, on Sept. 9 for Adam Abelson, whom President Joe Biden suggested for the District of Maryland 12 weeks earlier in recognition of his broad experience. The nominee’s distinguished record compiled across many years demonstrates that he is extremely intelligent, capable, ethical and industrious with balanced temperament. Abelson earned a well-qualified American Bar Association rating, which is the finest. The nominee enjoyed a very smooth hearing, and he masterfully won bipartisan 12-9 Judiciary Committee approval. The Senate must confirm Abelson because he proffers strong qualifications, and the court needs all of its jurists.

The upper chamber might analogously finish processing the five highly experienced, centrist appellate court and the 15 similar district nominees whom the committee has already reported. For instance, one excellent member of this cohort actually is Embry Kidd whom Biden impressively named to a Florida 11th Circuit opening. The panel concomitantly must rapidly scrutinize and discuss the particular qualifications of the single appeals court and five trial court nominees who garnered hearings but require panel approval. Democrats should prioritize confirmation of appellate court submissions, because their rulings articulate greater policy that binds a few jurisdictions. The committee should also carefully provide hearings for as many of the sole circuit and the nine district court picks who require them in the several weeks, as time permits. For example, one talented member of this group is Tiffany Johnson, the nominee whom Biden marshaled for a Northern District of Georgia vacancy.

Democrats must remember that they have dutifully scheduled a rigorous lame duck session that begins on Nov. 12 and continues until late in December. This five-week period should provide many of the nominees for whom the Senate earlier lacked adequate time to complete processing a sufficient period for the aspirants to secure confirmation.

Finally, Biden and White House Counsel who actively participate in confirming and naming judges must capitalize on the lame duck session to nominate and confirm the maximum possible number of accomplished, centrist jurists. They may assiduously cooperate with Republican and Democratic senators to promptly confirm all nominees who have completed hearings and won committee votes. Exceptional is Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., who asks that GOP colleagues avidly collaborate with Biden to seek and propose numerous dynamic choices for their states’ open posts, because Graham admonishes that elections in fact have real world consequences.

For the one future appeals court and 28 current and three future district vacancies that might lack nominees, Biden and White House Counsel should assertively cooperate with both parties’ senators to find acceptable candidates who may felicitously realize nomination and confirmation and promptly choose and confirm them. Should the GOP object to participating in a lame duck session, especially for the purposes of recommending and confirming more nominees, Biden and the Democratic Senate majority could remind the GOP that former President Donald Trump named and confirmed one appellate court and 12 district court judges after Biden had routed Trump in 2020.

Biden and the chamber must acutely capitalize on the plentiful September work days to aptly confirm and name many jurists, while they need to carefully plan for a rigorous lame duck session that fills more vacancies with excellent judges.

Carl Tobias is the University of Richmond Williams Chair in Law.