A Georgia lawmaker wants to do away with “no trespassing” signs and instead allow property owners to paint their trees purple.

Senate Bill 159, sponsored by freshman state Sen. Lee Anderson, R-Grovetown, follows the decades-old lead of other states, starting in 1989 in Arkansas. At the time, according to reports, rural property owners wanted an alternative to the "no trespassing" signs that they said were too easily removed, vandalized or just wore out too quickly.

Nearly a dozen states have followed suit, including Texas, North Carolina and Illinois. Why purple paint? It wasn’t used by the forestry industry, shows well in the outdoors and is one of the few colors that can be identified by someone who is color blind.

The proposal in Georgia doesn’t ban anyone from using the familiar signs, but instead adds purple paint to the state’s criminal trespass law as an alternative way to signal private property.

About the Author

Keep Reading

Sen. Ben Watson (R-Savannah) speaks in favor of SB 30 in the Senate Chambers during legislative day 26 in the State Capitol, Monday, March, 3, 2025, in Atlanta. Watson is the sponsor of the bill. (Jason Getz / AJC)

Credit: Jason Getz/AJC

Featured

State Sen. Marty Harbin (R-Tyrone) speaks during a state Senate Ethics Committee hearing on election security at the Paul D. Coverdell Legislative Office Building in Atlanta on Wednesday, November 1, 2023. Harbin is the main sponsor of SB 120, which would withhold state funding or state-administered federal money to any public school or college that implements DEI policies. (Arvin Temkar / arvin.temkar@ajc.com)

Credit: arvin.temkar@ajc.com